THE STATE vs DALABHAI AMARASHIBHAI MAKWANA — 5/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,323,506(2),294(B),427,114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: GJAH240000862025

Filing Number

5/2025

Filing Date

29-Jan-2025

Registration No

5/2025

Registration Date

29-Jan-2025

Court

Addl. Court Dholka

Judge

2-8th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

105

Police Station

KOTH POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 307,323,506(2),294(B),427,114

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE

    Adv. J C PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DALABHAI AMARASHIBHAI MAKWANA

  2. 2.SAGARBHAI AMARASHIBHAI MAKWANA (DEVIPUJAK)

  3. 3.KIRANBHAI DALABHAI MAKWANA (DEVIPUJAK)

  4. 4.SANJAYBHAI DALABHAI MAKWANA (DEVIPUJAK)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted all four defendants (Dalabhai, Sagarbhai, Kiranbhai, and Sanjayabhai Makwana) of charges under IPC sections 307, 323, 506(2), 294(b), 427, 114, and GP Act section 135, finding reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. The judge determined that while the complainant alleged a violent assault with weapons and property damage on May 14, 2024, the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the charges through independent corroborating evidence, as the complainant himself did not support the case during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    8th Addl District Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    8th Addl District Judge

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    8th Addl District Judge

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    8th Addl District Judge

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    8th Addl District Judge

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    8th Addl District Judge

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    8th Addl District Judge

  10. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    8th Addl District Judge

  11. 29-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    8th Addl District Judge

  12. 12-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    8th Addl District Judge

  13. 30-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  14. 17-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  15. 12-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  16. 10-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  17. 28-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  18. 13-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  19. 29-Oct-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  20. 09-Oct-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  21. 18-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  22. 02-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  23. 06-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  24. 25-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  25. 15-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  26. 02-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  27. 24-Apr-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  28. 24-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  29. 10-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 29-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted all four defendants (Dalabhai, Sagarbhai, Kiranbhai, and Sanjayabhai Makwana) of charges under IPC sections 307, 323, 506(2), 294(b), 427, 114, and GP Act section 135, finding reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. The judge determined that while the complainant alleged a violent assault with weapons and property damage on May 14, 2024, the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the charges through independent corroborating evidence, as the complainant himself did not support the case during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case