THE STATE vs NAVGHANBHAI KALUBHAI DEVIPUJAK — 4/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,323,506(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: GJAH240000852025

Filing Number

4/2025

Filing Date

29-Jan-2025

Registration No

4/2025

Registration Date

29-Jan-2025

Court

Addl. Court Dholka

Judge

2-8th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

106

Police Station

KOTH POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 307,323,506(2)
Arms Act Section 25(1)(B)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE

    Adv. J C PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NAVGHANBHAI KALUBHAI DEVIPUJAK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted the accused Navghanabhai Kaluabhai Devipujak of charges under IPC sections 307, 323, 506(2), Arms Act section 25(1)(b)(a), and GP Act section 135. The court found that while the prosecution presented evidence of a confrontation involving a firearm, the testimonies of the injured complainants were contradictory and failed to unequivocally establish that the accused threatened them with intent to kill or cause grievous injury. The court applied the benefit of doubt in the accused's favor, ordering his release on bail of Rs. 25,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    8th Addl District Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    8th Addl District Judge

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    8th Addl District Judge

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    8th Addl District Judge

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    8th Addl District Judge

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    8th Addl District Judge

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    8th Addl District Judge

  10. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    8th Addl District Judge

  11. 29-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    8th Addl District Judge

  12. 12-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    8th Addl District Judge

  13. 30-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  14. 17-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  15. 12-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  16. 10-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  17. 28-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  18. 13-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  19. 29-Oct-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  20. 09-Oct-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  21. 18-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  22. 02-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  23. 06-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  24. 25-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  25. 15-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    9th Addl District Judge

  26. 02-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  27. 24-Apr-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  28. 24-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  29. 10-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 29-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused Navghanabhai Kaluabhai Devipujak of charges under IPC sections 307, 323, 506(2), Arms Act section 25(1)(b)(a), and GP Act section 135. The court found that while the prosecution presented evidence of a confrontation involving a firearm, the testimonies of the injured complainants were contradictory and failed to unequivocally establish that the accused threatened them with intent to kill or cause grievous injury. The court applied the benefit of doubt in the accused's favor, ordering his release on bail of Rs. 25,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case