BACHUBHAI AJMALBHAI THAKOR vs THE STATE Advocate - J C PATEL — 32/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJAH240000722026

Case disposed

Filing Number

32/2026

Filing Date

23-01-2026

Registration No

32/2026

Registration Date

23-01-2026

Court

Addl. Court Dholka

Judge

1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11192006250268

Police Station

KERALA G.I.D.C POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

BACHUBHAI AJMALBHAI THAKOR

Adv. A B PARMAR

Respondent(s)

THE STATE Advocate - J C PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

ORDER

09-03-2026

ORDER

07-03-2026

ORDER

06-03-2026

ORDER

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
ORDER

The court granted regular bail to accused Bachubhai Ajmalbhai Thakor in a fraud case involving cheating and criminal conspiracy (IPC §420 & 120B), where the accused allegedly deceived a complainant of over Rs. 1 crore through tantric money-doubling schemes. The court held that since the chargesheet was filed, evidence was seized, investigation concluded, co-accused were already granted bail by the High Court, and the accused had no criminal history and fixed residence, detention would amount to pre-trial punishment; accordingly, bail was granted on a surety of Rs. 10,000 with stringent conditions including passport surrender, residence restrictions, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted regular bail to accused Bachubhai Ajmalbhai Thakor in a fraud case involving cheating and criminal conspiracy (IPC §420 & 120B), where the accused allegedly deceived a complainant of over Rs. 1 crore through tantric money-doubling schemes. The court held that since the chargesheet was filed, evidence was seized, investigation concluded, co-accused were already granted bail by the High Court, and the accused had no criminal history and fixed residence, detention would amount to pre-trial punishment; accordingly, bail was granted on a surety of Rs. 10,000 with stringent conditions including passport surrender, residence restrictions, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Addl. Court Dholka All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case