BACHUBHAI AJMALBHAI THAKOR vs THE STATE Advocate - J C PATEL — 32/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH240000722026
Filing Number
32/2026
Filing Date
23-01-2026
Registration No
32/2026
Registration Date
23-01-2026
Court
Addl. Court Dholka
Judge
1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192006250268
Police Station
KERALA G.I.D.C POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BACHUBHAI AJMALBHAI THAKOR
Adv. A B PARMAR
Respondent(s)
THE STATE Advocate - J C PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
ORDER
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted regular bail to accused Bachubhai Ajmalbhai Thakor in a fraud case involving cheating and criminal conspiracy (IPC §420 & 120B), where the accused allegedly deceived a complainant of over Rs. 1 crore through tantric money-doubling schemes. The court held that since the chargesheet was filed, evidence was seized, investigation concluded, co-accused were already granted bail by the High Court, and the accused had no criminal history and fixed residence, detention would amount to pre-trial punishment; accordingly, bail was granted on a surety of Rs. 10,000 with stringent conditions including passport surrender, residence restrictions, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted regular bail to accused Bachubhai Ajmalbhai Thakor in a fraud case involving cheating and criminal conspiracy (IPC §420 & 120B), where the accused allegedly deceived a complainant of over Rs. 1 crore through tantric money-doubling schemes. The court held that since the chargesheet was filed, evidence was seized, investigation concluded, co-accused were already granted bail by the High Court, and the accused had no criminal history and fixed residence, detention would amount to pre-trial punishment; accordingly, bail was granted on a surety of Rs. 10,000 with stringent conditions including passport surrender, residence restrictions, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts