BACHUBHAI AJMALBHAI THAKOR vs THE STATE Advocate - J C PATEL — 32/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJAH240000722026

Filing Number

32/2026

Filing Date

23-Jan-2026

Registration No

32/2026

Registration Date

23-Jan-2026

Court

Addl. Court Dholka

Judge

1-Addl.district & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11192006250268

Police Station

KERALA G.I.D.C POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BACHUBHAI AJMALBHAI THAKOR

    Adv. A B PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE Advocate - J C PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted regular bail to accused Bachubhai Ajmalbhai Thakor in a fraud case involving cheating and criminal conspiracy (IPC §420 & 120B), where the accused allegedly deceived a complainant of over Rs. 1 crore through tantric money-doubling schemes. The court held that since the chargesheet was filed, evidence was seized, investigation concluded, co-accused were already granted bail by the High Court, and the accused had no criminal history and fixed residence, detention would amount to pre-trial punishment; accordingly, bail was granted on a surety of Rs. 10,000 with stringent conditions including passport surrender, residence restrictions, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  9. 03-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  10. 02-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  11. 28-Feb-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  12. 27-Feb-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  13. 26-Feb-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  14. 24-Feb-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  15. 23-Feb-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  16. 21-Feb-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  17. 20-Feb-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  18. 19-Feb-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  19. 18-Feb-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  20. 17-Feb-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  21. 16-Feb-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  22. 13-Feb-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  23. 12-Feb-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  24. 11-Feb-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  25. 09-Feb-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  26. 07-Feb-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  27. 06-Feb-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  28. 05-Feb-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  29. 04-Feb-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  30. 02-Feb-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  31. 30-Jan-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  32. 29-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  33. 28-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 23-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 32/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted regular bail to accused Bachubhai Ajmalbhai Thakor in a fraud case involving cheating and criminal conspiracy (IPC §420 & 120B), where the accused allegedly deceived a complainant of over Rs. 1 crore through tantric money-doubling schemes. The court held that since the chargesheet was filed, evidence was seized, investigation concluded, co-accused were already granted bail by the High Court, and the accused had no criminal history and fixed residence, detention would amount to pre-trial punishment; accordingly, bail was granted on a surety of Rs. 10,000 with stringent conditions including passport surrender, residence restrictions, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case