THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs LAXMANBHAI KARMASHIBHAI KANANI Advocate - R B PATEL — 170/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),352,351(3),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 15th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH230002582025
Filing Number
170/2025
Filing Date
04-07-2025
Registration No
170/2025
Registration Date
04-07-2025
Court
Taluka Court, Dholera
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192019250052
Police Station
DHOLERA POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
LAXMANBHAI KARMASHIBHAI KANANI Advocate - R B PATEL
FALJIBHAI KARMASHIBHAI KANANI
Adv. R B PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 01-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 11-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 11-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted both accused (Lakshman Bhai and Falji Bhai) of charges under BNS Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 54 and GP Act Section 135 (criminal intimidation and wrongful restraint). The court found that the complainant and witnesses failed to substantiate their allegations beyond reasonable doubt—their testimony was inconsistent, uncorroborated by medical evidence or documentary proof, and the panchnamas lacked credibility. The accused were ordered to post bail of ₹5,000 each with personal bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted both accused (Lakshman Bhai and Falji Bhai) of charges under BNS Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 54 and GP Act Section 135 (criminal intimidation and wrongful restraint). The court found that the complainant and witnesses failed to substantiate their allegations beyond reasonable doubt—their testimony was inconsistent, uncorroborated by medical evidence or documentary proof, and the panchnamas lacked credibility. The accused were ordered to post bail of ₹5,000 each with personal bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts