JAGDISHBHAI NATUBHAI CHUDASHAMA vs PIPLI GRAMPANCHAYAT Advocate - J K SOMANI — 11/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJAH230000952024
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
11/2024
Filing Date
11-03-2024
Registration No
11/2024
Registration Date
11-03-2024
Court
Taluka Court, Dholera
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAGDISHBHAI NATUBHAI CHUDASHAMA
Adv. J N KHATRI, N D RAVAL
Respondent(s)
PIPLI GRAMPANCHAYAT Advocate - J K SOMANI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION
ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 03-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 25-03-2026 | ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION |
| 11-03-2026 | ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION |
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed. The Principal Civil Judge of Dholera rejected the plaintiff's application for interim/temporary injunction regarding a disputed property (agricultural land with a hotel structure) in Pipli village. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, did not prove balance of convenience in their favor, and concealed material facts (including pending land-grabbing proceedings against them), rendering them ineligible for relief under established legal principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed. The Principal Civil Judge of Dholera rejected the plaintiff's application for interim/temporary injunction regarding a disputed property (agricultural land with a hotel structure) in Pipli village. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, did not prove balance of convenience in their favor, and concealed material facts (including pending land-grabbing proceedings against them), rendering them ineligible for relief under established legal principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts