THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SVRAJBHAI SURESHBHAI AAMBALIYA Advocate - R B PATEL — 22/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),118(1),352,351(3),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH230000422026
Filing Number
22/2026
Filing Date
30-01-2026
Registration No
22/2026
Registration Date
30-01-2026
Court
Taluka Court, Dholera
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192019250279
Police Station
DHOLERA POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SVRAJBHAI SURESHBHAI AAMBALIYA Advocate - R B PATEL
MAHESHBHAI KANJIBHAI AAMBALIYA
Adv. R B PATEL
MADHUBEN KANJIBHAI AAMBALIYA
Adv. R B PATEL
ASHOKBHAI KANJIBHAI AAMBALIYA
Adv. R B PATEL
SANGITABEN W/O MAHESHBHAI AAMBALIYA
Adv. R B PATEL-G/2721/2022
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 26-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 11-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The Dholera Judicial Magistrate First Class acquitted all five defendants (Swarajbhai, Maheshbhai, Madhubhen, Ashokbhai, and Sangitaben) of charges under BNS Sections 114(2), 118(1), 332, 331(3), 54 and GP Act Section 135. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations of assault, abusive language, and death threats against the complainant beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's and witnesses' testimony lacked corroboration with documentary evidence like medical certificates and police records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Decision The Dholera Judicial Magistrate First Class acquitted all five defendants (Swarajbhai, Maheshbhai, Madhubhen, Ashokbhai, and Sangitaben) of charges under BNS Sections 114(2), 118(1), 332, 331(3), 54 and GP Act Section 135. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations of assault, abusive language, and death threats against the complainant beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's and witnesses' testimony lacked corroboration with documentary evidence like medical certificates and police records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts