GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SURESHBHAI BABUBHAI PATANI (MAJAWALA) — 422441/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH224496342025

Filing Number

416124/2025

Filing Date

17-Dec-2025

Registration No

422441/2025

Registration Date

17-Dec-2025

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11191031250317

Police Station

SHAHIBAUG POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD CITY

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223
Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 Section 5(1)
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 Section 15

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SURESHBHAI BABUBHAI PATANI (MAJAWALA)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Ahmedabad Chief Judicial Magistrate Court convicted Sureshbhai Babubhai Patani under IPC Section 223 (disobedience to police commissioner's order) after finding he violated the commissioner's direction by failing to appear at the specified time and place. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 300, considering it his first offense and his expression of remorse, thereby declining to impose imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 422441/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Ahmedabad Chief Judicial Magistrate Court convicted Sureshbhai Babubhai Patani under IPC Section 223 (disobedience to police commissioner's order) after finding he violated the commissioner's direction by failing to appear at the specified time and place. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 300, considering it his first offense and his expression of remorse, thereby declining to impose imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case