GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs RAHUL MUKESHBHAI BHIL — 417247/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH224438352025

Filing Number

410986/2025

Filing Date

11-Dec-2025

Registration No

417247/2025

Registration Date

11-Dec-2025

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11191031250799

Police Station

SHAHIBAUG POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD CITY

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL MUKESHBHAI BHIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: 417247/2025 The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad dropped proceedings against Rahul Mukeshbhai Bhil under Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act, 1951, finding that the police investigation was illegal and void. The court held that Section 135 is a non-cognizable offence, and the police violated CrPC Section 155(2) by investigating without prior Magistrate permission, rendering the charge sheet and all subsequent proceedings invalid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 13-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Dec-2025

    Restored

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 13-Dec-2025

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 11-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 417247/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 417247/2025 The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad dropped proceedings against Rahul Mukeshbhai Bhil under Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act, 1951, finding that the police investigation was illegal and void. The court held that Section 135 is a non-cognizable offence, and the police violated CrPC Section 155(2) by investigating without prior Magistrate permission, rendering the charge sheet and all subsequent proceedings invalid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case