GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs RAVI URFR KALU URFE PATHAN MOHANBHAI RATILAL RATHOD — 416331/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH224428622025

Filing Number

410075/2025

Filing Date

10-Dec-2025

Registration No

416331/2025

Registration Date

10-Dec-2025

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11191031250767

Police Station

SHAHIBAUG POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD CITY

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1)

Petitioner(s)

1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.RAVI URFR KALU URFE PATHAN MOHANBHAI RATILAL RATHOD

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

Case 416331/2025 Summary: The Ahmedabad Chief Judicial Magistrate quashed proceedings against the accused under Section 135(1) of the Gujarat Police Act, 1951, finding that police illegally investigated a non-cognizable offense without prior magistrate permission, violating CrPC Section 155(2). The court held the investigation, charge sheet, and all subsequent proceedings void and invalid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Chief Judicial Magistrate
13-Mar-2026

Process To Accused

Chief Judicial Magistrate
13-Dec-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
13-Dec-2025

Restored

Chief Judicial Magistrate
13-Dec-2025

Disposed

Chief Judicial Magistrate
10-Dec-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 416331/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 416331/2025 Summary: The Ahmedabad Chief Judicial Magistrate quashed proceedings against the accused under Section 135(1) of the Gujarat Police Act, 1951, finding that police illegally investigated a non-cognizable offense without prior magistrate permission, violating CrPC Section 155(2). The court held the investigation, charge sheet, and all subsequent proceedings void and invalid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.