GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs BHAVIN ARVINDBHAI PANCHAL — 402479/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH224285772025

Filing Number

396257/2025

Filing Date

02-Dec-2025

Registration No

402479/2025

Registration Date

02-Dec-2025

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11191015250162

Police Station

Nikol Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHAVIN ARVINDBHAI PANCHAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dropped all proceedings against respondent Bhavin Arvindbhai Panchal, finding that police investigated a Section 135(1) violation of the Gujarat Police Act without obtaining mandatory Magistrate's permission, making it a non-cognizable offence. Since the investigation was illegal under CrPC Section 155(2), the charge sheet and all subsequent proceedings were declared void and invalid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 13-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 402479/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dropped all proceedings against respondent Bhavin Arvindbhai Panchal, finding that police investigated a Section 135(1) violation of the Gujarat Police Act without obtaining mandatory Magistrate's permission, making it a non-cognizable offence. Since the investigation was illegal under CrPC Section 155(2), the charge sheet and all subsequent proceedings were declared void and invalid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case