GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs RIHAN URFE BADSHAH SHAIKHBANNU NAJIRBHAI SHAIKH — 378260/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH224035292025

Filing Number

372158/2025

Filing Date

19-Nov-2025

Registration No

378260/2025

Registration Date

19-Nov-2025

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11191031250687

Police Station

SHAHIBAUG POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD CITY

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RIHAN URFE BADSHAH SHAIKHBANNU NAJIRBHAI SHAIKH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate quashed proceedings against the accused under Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act, 1951, finding that police investigation violated procedural law by investigating a non-cognizable offense without prior Magistrate permission under CrPC Section 155(2). Consequently, the charge sheet and all subsequent proceedings were declared illegal and void, though the prosecution was granted liberty to pursue lawful remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 13-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 19-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 378260/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate quashed proceedings against the accused under Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act, 1951, finding that police investigation violated procedural law by investigating a non-cognizable offense without prior Magistrate permission under CrPC Section 155(2). Consequently, the charge sheet and all subsequent proceedings were declared illegal and void, though the prosecution was granted liberty to pursue lawful remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case