GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs ALPESH URFE BHURO URFE KHARI BHARATBHAI RAMAJI THAKOR — 378246/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 142. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH224035132025
Filing Number
372142/2025
Filing Date
19-Nov-2025
Registration No
378246/2025
Registration Date
19-Nov-2025
Court
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11191031250677
Police Station
SHAHIBAUG POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD CITY
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.ALPESH URFE BHURO URFE KHARI BHARATBHAI RAMAJI THAKOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The court dropped proceedings against the accused under Section 142 of the Gujarat Police Act, finding that police investigated a non-cognizable offence without obtaining mandatory prior permission from the Magistrate, rendering the investigation and charge sheet illegal and void. The prosecution was given liberty to pursue appropriate legal remedies while seized property was ordered disposed per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Dec-2025
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 378246/2025
The court dropped proceedings against the accused under Section 142 of the Gujarat Police Act, finding that police investigated a non-cognizable offence without obtaining mandatory prior permission from the Magistrate, rendering the investigation and charge sheet illegal and void. The prosecution was given liberty to pursue appropriate legal remedies while seized property was ordered disposed per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts