THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES vs GATRAD CAL TEST LABORATORIES AND RESERCH PTV LTD Advocate - F M JARADI — 132575/2021
Case under Companies Act, 2013 Section 99. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH221413092021
Filing Number
133966/2021
Filing Date
11-10-2021
Registration No
132575/2021
Registration Date
11-10-2021
Court
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
2-ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD CITY
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
Adv. G
Respondent(s)
GATRAD CAL TEST LABORATORIES AND RESERCH PTV LTD Advocate - F M JARADI
RAMJIBHAI PREMJIBHAI LADVA
RAMABEN RAMJIBHAI LADVA
PRITESHBHAI RAMJIBHAI LADVA
DIVYESHBHAI RAMJIBHAI LADVA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD CITY
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 25-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 25-11-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 07-10-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court found the company and its directors guilty of violating the Companies Act, 1956 (Section 398) for failing to hold Annual General Meetings for 91 days beyond the prescribed period. The court sentenced the company to a fine of Rs. 10,000 and each director to Rs. 900, along with additional daily penalties for the delay period, while granting partial relief considering the company's weak financial condition and first-time offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court found the company and its directors guilty of violating the Companies Act, 1956 (Section 398) for failing to hold Annual General Meetings for 91 days beyond the prescribed period. The court sentenced the company to a fine of Rs. 10,000 and each director to Rs. 900, along with additional daily penalties for the delay period, while granting partial relief considering the company's weak financial condition and first-time offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts