THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES vs GATRAD CAL TEST LABORATORIES AND RESERCH PTV LTD Advocate - F M JARADI — 132575/2021

Case under Companies Act, 2013 Section 99. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH221413092021

Filing Number

133966/2021

Filing Date

11-Oct-2021

Registration No

132575/2021

Registration Date

11-Oct-2021

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

2-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Companies Act, 2013 Section 99

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES

    Adv. G

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GATRAD CAL TEST LABORATORIES AND RESERCH PTV LTD Advocate - F M JARADI

  2. 2.RAMJIBHAI PREMJIBHAI LADVA

  3. 3.RAMABEN RAMJIBHAI LADVA

  4. 4.PRITESHBHAI RAMJIBHAI LADVA

  5. 5.DIVYESHBHAI RAMJIBHAI LADVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court found the company and its directors guilty of violating the Companies Act, 1956 (Section 398) for failing to hold Annual General Meetings for 91 days beyond the prescribed period. The court sentenced the company to a fine of Rs. 10,000 and each director to Rs. 900, along with additional daily penalties for the delay period, while granting partial relief considering the company's weak financial condition and first-time offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  6. 25-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  7. 07-Oct-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  8. 13-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  9. 10-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  10. 13-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  11. 14-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  12. 05-Feb-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  13. 05-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  14. 05-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  15. 06-May-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  16. 05-Feb-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  17. 16-Oct-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  18. 26-Jul-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  19. 27-Mar-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  20. 18-Jan-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  21. 13-Dec-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  22. 28-Sep-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  23. 26-Jul-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  24. 09-Jun-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  25. 23-Mar-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  26. 13-Jan-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  27. 15-Nov-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 11-Oct-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 132575/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court found the company and its directors guilty of violating the Companies Act, 1956 (Section 398) for failing to hold Annual General Meetings for 91 days beyond the prescribed period. The court sentenced the company to a fine of Rs. 10,000 and each director to Rs. 900, along with additional daily penalties for the delay period, while granting partial relief considering the company's weak financial condition and first-time offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case