SAMRIN IRFAN KURESHI vs AMJADKHAN ABDUL HAMIDKHAN PATHAN (RINKU) — 13041/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 316(2),318(4),336(2),336(3),338,61(2). Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 17th April 2026.
CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY
CNR: GJAH221307172025
Filing Number
13037/2025
Filing Date
27-May-2025
Registration No
13041/2025
Registration Date
27-May-2025
Court
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 15-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAMRIN IRFAN KURESHI
Adv. M R VAIDHYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.AMJADKHAN ABDUL HAMIDKHAN PATHAN (RINKU)
-
2.JAVID HUSEN SABBIRHUSEN SHAIKH
-
3.AATIF
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Criminal Court rejected the accused's petition challenging the criminal proceedings under the IPC sections cited. The court held that sufficient prima facie case exists against the accused for the alleged offenses, and the proceedings should continue. No stay or bail relief was granted as the evidence supports the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
11-Mar-2026
Order
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Complainant
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
20-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
02-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
04-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
06-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 13041/2025
Summary The Criminal Court rejected the accused's petition challenging the criminal proceedings under the IPC sections cited. The court held that sufficient prima facie case exists against the accused for the alleged offenses, and the proceedings should continue. No stay or bail relief was granted as the evidence supports the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts