GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs ASHWINBHAI RAJUBHAI PATANI (KHOTRIKHOLA) — 104727/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH221223612025

Filing Number

104699/2025

Filing Date

19-May-2025

Registration No

104727/2025

Registration Date

19-May-2025

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11191031240540

Police Station

SHAHIBAUG POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD CITY

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHWINBHAI RAJUBHAI PATANI (KHOTRIKHOLA)

  2. 2.SHYAM KISHORBHAI PATANI (LAPELANGWALA)

  3. 3.BABUBHAI JIVABHAI PARMAR

  4. 4.ANIL RAJUBHAI THAKOR

  5. 5.JIGNESH PRAVINCHANDRA BHAVSAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 104727/2025 Summary The Gujarat High Court stayed proceedings against the respondents (Ashwinbhai Rajubhai Patani, Shyam Kishorbhai Patani, and Babubhai Jivabhai Parmar) under CrPC Section 258, finding that police failed to effectively serve process despite multiple attempts, their whereabouts remain unknown, and the case had been pending excessively due to investigative delays rather than accused misconduct. The court held that cases lacking sufficient gravity should not remain pending indefinitely due to administrative negligence, and directed issuance of a formal warrant with directive that police make genuine efforts to apprehend the accused before further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 13-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 11-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 13-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 06-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 05-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 19-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 104727/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 104727/2025 Summary The Gujarat High Court stayed proceedings against the respondents (Ashwinbhai Rajubhai Patani, Shyam Kishorbhai Patani, and Babubhai Jivabhai Parmar) under CrPC Section 258, finding that police failed to effectively serve process despite multiple attempts, their whereabouts remain unknown, and the case had been pending excessively due to investigative delays rather than accused misconduct. The court held that cases lacking sufficient gravity should not remain pending indefinitely due to administrative negligence, and directed issuance of a formal warrant with directive that police make genuine efforts to apprehend the accused before further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case