GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs ASHWINBHAI RAJUBHAI PATANI (KHOTRIKHOLA) — 104727/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH221223612025
Filing Number
104699/2025
Filing Date
19-05-2025
Registration No
104727/2025
Registration Date
19-05-2025
Court
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
1-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
FIR Details
FIR Number
11191031240540
Police Station
SHAHIBAUG POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD CITY
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ASHWINBHAI RAJUBHAI PATANI (KHOTRIKHOLA)
SHYAM KISHORBHAI PATANI (LAPELANGWALA)
BABUBHAI JIVABHAI PARMAR
ANIL RAJUBHAI THAKOR
JIGNESH PRAVINCHANDRA BHAVSAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 13-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 11-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 13-09-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 104727/2025 Summary The Gujarat High Court stayed proceedings against the respondents (Ashwinbhai Rajubhai Patani, Shyam Kishorbhai Patani, and Babubhai Jivabhai Parmar) under CrPC Section 258, finding that police failed to effectively serve process despite multiple attempts, their whereabouts remain unknown, and the case had been pending excessively due to investigative delays rather than accused misconduct. The court held that cases lacking sufficient gravity should not remain pending indefinitely due to administrative negligence, and directed issuance of a formal warrant with directive that police make genuine efforts to apprehend the accused before further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 104727/2025 Summary The Gujarat High Court stayed proceedings against the respondents (Ashwinbhai Rajubhai Patani, Shyam Kishorbhai Patani, and Babubhai Jivabhai Parmar) under CrPC Section 258, finding that police failed to effectively serve process despite multiple attempts, their whereabouts remain unknown, and the case had been pending excessively due to investigative delays rather than accused misconduct. The court held that cases lacking sufficient gravity should not remain pending indefinitely due to administrative negligence, and directed issuance of a formal warrant with directive that police make genuine efforts to apprehend the accused before further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts