GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs KALPESHBHAI URFE KHAPTI KANTIBHAI MANIBHAI RATHOD Advocate - A M MANSURI — 102903/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2),54. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISED on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH221204662025
Filing Number
102904/2025
Filing Date
16-May-2025
Registration No
102903/2025
Registration Date
16-May-2025
Court
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
5-4th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISED
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11191065241244
Police Station
NAROL POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KALPESHBHAI URFE KHAPTI KANTIBHAI MANIBHAI RATHOD Advocate - A M MANSURI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary of Case 102903/2025 The National Lok Adalat court acquitted the accused under BNS Act 2023 Section 303(2) after the petitioner (Government of Gujarat) and respondent reached a settlement, with both parties agreeing not to pursue the case further. The court ordered return of seized materials to their rightful owner after verifying ownership, or confirmed any prior interim orders regarding the same. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
4th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
4th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
22-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
4th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
06-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
35th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
18-Aug-2025
Process To Accused
35th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
18-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 102903/2025
Summary of Case 102903/2025 The National Lok Adalat court acquitted the accused under BNS Act 2023 Section 303(2) after the petitioner (Government of Gujarat) and respondent reached a settlement, with both parties agreeing not to pursue the case further. The court ordered return of seized materials to their rightful owner after verifying ownership, or confirmed any prior interim orders regarding the same. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts