CHAUHAN MANHARBHAI AMRATJI vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT — 2518/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJAH221033192026
Filing Number
2518/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
2518/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
2-ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD CITY
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHAUHAN MANHARBHAI AMRATJI
Adv. P R VALAND
Respondent(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD CITY
Disposed
REPLY OF I.O.
REPLY OF I.O.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | REPLY OF I.O. |
| 13-03-2026 | REPLY OF I.O. |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Ahmedabad granted Chauhan Manharbhai Amratji's petition to recover his OPPO A-3x mobile phone (IMEI: 866275071408554) that was seized as evidence in a criminal case at Naroda Police Station. The court found the petitioner had established ownership through the device's bill and Aadhaar card, and determined that prolonged police custody risked damage to the electronic device and caused financial and practical hardship to the owner. The phone was ordered returned to the petitioner in conditional custody, subject to strict conditions including maintaining the device's condition, producing it before the court as required, allowing evidence extraction if necessary, and bearing photography costs at the investigating officer's discretion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Ahmedabad granted Chauhan Manharbhai Amratji's petition to recover his OPPO A-3x mobile phone (IMEI: 866275071408554) that was seized as evidence in a criminal case at Naroda Police Station. The court found the petitioner had established ownership through the device's bill and Aadhaar card, and determined that prolonged police custody risked damage to the electronic device and caused financial and practical hardship to the owner. The phone was ordered returned to the petitioner in conditional custody, subject to strict conditions including maintaining the device's condition, producing it before the court as required, allowing evidence extraction if necessary, and bearing photography costs at the investigating officer's discretion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts