CHAUHAN MANHARBHAI AMRATJI vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT — 2518/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJAH221033192026

Case disposed

Filing Number

2518/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

2518/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

2-ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD CITY

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 497

Petitioner(s)

CHAUHAN MANHARBHAI AMRATJI

Adv. P R VALAND

Respondent(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD CITY

23-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

13-03-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
ORDER

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Ahmedabad granted Chauhan Manharbhai Amratji's petition to recover his OPPO A-3x mobile phone (IMEI: 866275071408554) that was seized as evidence in a criminal case at Naroda Police Station. The court found the petitioner had established ownership through the device's bill and Aadhaar card, and determined that prolonged police custody risked damage to the electronic device and caused financial and practical hardship to the owner. The phone was ordered returned to the petitioner in conditional custody, subject to strict conditions including maintaining the device's condition, producing it before the court as required, allowing evidence extraction if necessary, and bearing photography costs at the investigating officer's discretion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Ahmedabad granted Chauhan Manharbhai Amratji's petition to recover his OPPO A-3x mobile phone (IMEI: 866275071408554) that was seized as evidence in a criminal case at Naroda Police Station. The court found the petitioner had established ownership through the device's bill and Aadhaar card, and determined that prolonged police custody risked damage to the electronic device and caused financial and practical hardship to the owner. The phone was ordered returned to the petitioner in conditional custody, subject to strict conditions including maintaining the device's condition, producing it before the court as required, allowing evidence extraction if necessary, and bearing photography costs at the investigating officer's discretion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case