GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SHASHIKNAT SURESHBHAI PARMAR — 76284/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH220834782019

Filing Number

76608/2019

Filing Date

26-Aug-2019

Registration No

76284/2019

Registration Date

26-Aug-2019

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

2-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

19

Police Station

VASNA POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHASHIKNAT SURESHBHAI PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: 76284/2019 Decision: The court discharged the accused under Section 239 of the Criminal Procedure Code, finding no prima facie case. The accused was charged with theft of a Honda Active vehicle (₹40,000) on 26/02/2019, but the court determined the evidence was insufficient—the accused confessed only to police (inadmissible under Evidence Act Section 25), no direct evidence connected the accused to the crime, and no recovered materials linked them to the offense. Given the 7+ year delay and lack of credible evidence, the court deemed continued prosecution unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  5. 11-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  6. 12-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  7. 10-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  8. 21-Apr-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  9. 10-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    41st Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  10. 03-Feb-2025

    Process To Accused

    41st Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  11. 07-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    41st Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  12. 09-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    41st Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  13. 13-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    41st Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  14. 11-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    41st Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  15. 18-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    41st Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  16. 05-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    41st Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  17. 16-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    41st Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  18. 16-May-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  19. 23-Feb-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  20. 24-Nov-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  21. 29-Aug-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  22. 15-Apr-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  23. 03-Feb-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  24. 29-Dec-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  25. 05-Nov-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  26. 17-Sep-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  27. 12-Aug-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  28. 04-Aug-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  29. 16-Jul-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  30. 18-Jun-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  31. 26-May-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  32. 08-Apr-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  33. 04-Mar-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  34. 14-Feb-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  35. 26-Nov-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  36. 13-Oct-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  37. 17-Aug-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  38. 01-Jul-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  39. 19-Jun-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  40. 20-Apr-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  41. 24-Mar-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  42. 21-Jan-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  43. 02-Nov-2020

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  44. 25-Aug-2020

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  45. 25-Jun-2020

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  46. 27-Apr-2020

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  47. 17-Mar-2020

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  48. 11-Feb-2020

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  49. 03-Jan-2020

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  50. 18-Nov-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  51. 10-Oct-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  52. 04-Sep-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  53. 26-Aug-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 76284/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 76284/2019 Decision: The court discharged the accused under Section 239 of the Criminal Procedure Code, finding no prima facie case. The accused was charged with theft of a Honda Active vehicle (₹40,000) on 26/02/2019, but the court determined the evidence was insufficient—the accused confessed only to police (inadmissible under Evidence Act Section 25), no direct evidence connected the accused to the crime, and no recovered materials linked them to the offense. Given the 7+ year delay and lack of credible evidence, the court deemed continued prosecution unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case