GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs HIRARAM BISNOI — 77680/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH220832472020
Filing Number
77734/2020
Filing Date
18-Dec-2020
Registration No
77680/2020
Registration Date
18-Dec-2020
Court
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
2-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11191066200906
Police Station
VASNA POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.HIRARAM BISNOI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Hiraram Bisnoi (77680/2020) The court discharged the accused under Section 239 of the Criminal Procedure Code, finding the chargesheet groundless. The accused was charged with vehicle theft (IPC Section 379), but the court determined that the only evidence was the accused's police confession, which is inadmissible under Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act. With no direct, circumstantial, or corroborating evidence on record and no recovered stolen property, the court held insufficient grounds existed to proceed to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
11-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
12-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
10-Jul-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
27-Jun-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
27-Mar-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
26-Dec-2024
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
08-Nov-2024
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
26-Sep-2024
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
25-Jul-2024
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
25-Apr-2024
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
25-Jan-2024
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
08-Dec-2023
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
25-Sep-2023
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
30-Jun-2023
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
10-Mar-2023
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
04-Feb-2023
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
06-Jan-2023
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
07-Nov-2022
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
17-Oct-2022
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
07-Oct-2022
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
13-Aug-2022
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
06-Aug-2022
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
07-Jul-2022
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
17-May-2022
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
25-Mar-2022
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
21-Jan-2022
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
18-Oct-2021
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
02-Aug-2021
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
03-Jul-2021
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
19-Jun-2021
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
07-May-2021
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2021
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
16-Jan-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Dec-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 77680/2020
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Hiraram Bisnoi (77680/2020) The court discharged the accused under Section 239 of the Criminal Procedure Code, finding the chargesheet groundless. The accused was charged with vehicle theft (IPC Section 379), but the court determined that the only evidence was the accused's police confession, which is inadmissible under Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act. With no direct, circumstantial, or corroborating evidence on record and no recovered stolen property, the court held insufficient grounds existed to proceed to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts