THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES vs NIMISHBHAI KESHAVLAL PATEL Advocate - B H SHAH — 59717/2018

Case under Companies Act, 2013 Section 211. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH220656742018

Filing Number

59751/2018

Filing Date

30-Jun-2018

Registration No

59717/2018

Registration Date

30-Jun-2018

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

2-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Companies Act, 2013 Section 211

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NIMISHBHAI KESHAVLAL PATEL Advocate - B H SHAH

  2. 2.NILESH KESHAVLAL PATEL

  3. 3.ASHWINBHAI PARSHOTTAMDAS PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 for filing false information with the Registrar. The court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Rs. 4,000 (with three months simple imprisonment as an alternative), imposed an additional fine of Rs. 500 under Section 446 of the Companies Act, and ordered refund of court fees, while noting the company's weak financial condition as a mitigating factor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  5. 10-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  6. 11-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  7. 02-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  8. 02-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  9. 02-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  10. 02-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  11. 02-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  12. 02-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  13. 21-Apr-2025

    Plea

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  14. 15-Jan-2025

    Plea

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  15. 15-Oct-2024

    Plea

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  16. 08-Jul-2024

    Plea

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  17. 09-Apr-2024

    Plea

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  18. 14-Feb-2024

    Plea

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  19. 05-Dec-2023

    Plea

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  20. 23-Oct-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  21. 17-Aug-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  22. 17-Apr-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate

  23. 06-Feb-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  24. 30-Nov-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  25. 10-Oct-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  26. 22-Aug-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  27. 11-Jul-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  28. 04-May-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  29. 04-Feb-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  30. 17-Dec-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  31. 12-Oct-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  32. 17-Aug-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  33. 05-Apr-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  34. 11-Feb-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  35. 16-Dec-2020

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  36. 03-Oct-2020

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  37. 21-Jul-2020

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  38. 21-May-2020

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  39. 26-Feb-2020

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  40. 10-Dec-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  41. 23-Sep-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  42. 22-Jul-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  43. 04-Jun-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  44. 16-May-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  45. 16-Mar-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  46. 04-Feb-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  47. 24-Dec-2018

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  48. 12-Nov-2018

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  49. 06-Oct-2018

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  50. 01-Sep-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 30-Jun-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 59717/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 for filing false information with the Registrar. The court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Rs. 4,000 (with three months simple imprisonment as an alternative), imposed an additional fine of Rs. 500 under Section 446 of the Companies Act, and ordered refund of court fees, while noting the company's weak financial condition as a mitigating factor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case