THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES vs NIMISHBHAI KESHAVLAL PATEL Advocate - B H SHAH — 59710/2018

Case under Companies Act, 1956 Section 211. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH220656642018

Filing Number

59743/2018

Filing Date

30-Jun-2018

Registration No

59710/2018

Registration Date

30-Jun-2018

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

2-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Companies Act, 1956 Section 211

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NIMISHBHAI KESHAVLAL PATEL Advocate - B H SHAH

  2. 2.NILESH KESHAVLAL PATEL

  3. 3.ASHWINBHAI PARSHOTTAMDAS PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court convicted two accused under Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 for causing wrongful loss to a company through fraudulent misrepresentation. The accused were sentenced to pay a fine of ₹2,000 each, with three months imprisonment as an alternative, and directed to refund ₹500 from the fine amount to cover court expenses, considering the company's weak financial condition and the first-time nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  5. 10-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  6. 11-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  7. 02-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  8. 02-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  9. 02-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  10. 02-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  11. 02-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  12. 02-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  13. 21-Apr-2025

    Plea

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  14. 15-Jan-2025

    Plea

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  15. 15-Oct-2024

    Plea

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  16. 08-Jul-2024

    Plea

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  17. 09-Apr-2024

    Plea

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  18. 14-Feb-2024

    Plea

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  19. 05-Dec-2023

    Plea

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  20. 23-Oct-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  21. 24-Aug-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  22. 10-Apr-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  23. 01-Feb-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  24. 29-Nov-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  25. 20-Sep-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  26. 25-Jul-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  27. 10-May-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  28. 05-Feb-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  29. 12-Nov-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  30. 27-Sep-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  31. 17-Aug-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  32. 05-Apr-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  33. 11-Feb-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  34. 16-Dec-2020

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  35. 03-Oct-2020

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  36. 21-Jul-2020

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  37. 21-May-2020

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  38. 26-Feb-2020

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  39. 10-Dec-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  40. 23-Sep-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  41. 22-Jul-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  42. 04-Jun-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  43. 16-May-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  44. 16-Mar-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  45. 04-Feb-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  46. 24-Dec-2018

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  47. 12-Nov-2018

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  48. 06-Oct-2018

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  49. 01-Sep-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  50. 30-Jun-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 59710/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted two accused under Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 for causing wrongful loss to a company through fraudulent misrepresentation. The accused were sentenced to pay a fine of ₹2,000 each, with three months imprisonment as an alternative, and directed to refund ₹500 from the fine amount to cover court expenses, considering the company's weak financial condition and the first-time nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case