GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs DHAVAL @ BUCHHIYO RAKESHBHAI PARMAR — 61028/2020
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH220653732020
Filing Number
61063/2020
Filing Date
26-10-2020
Registration No
61028/2020
Registration Date
26-10-2020
Court
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
2-ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD CITY
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
3727
Police Station
NARODA POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD CITY
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
DHAVAL @ BUCHHIYO RAKESHBHAI PARMAR
PRAVINSINH RATUSINH PARMAR
JAGABHAI CHATURBHAI ZALA
SUKHDEVSINH @ SUKHO DASHRATHSINH PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD CITY
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 23-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 13-11-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 15-09-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the three accused (Dhaval @ Buchhiyo Rakeshbhai Parmar, Pravinsinh Ratusinh Parmar, and Jagabhai Chaturbhai Zala) under IPC Section 12(a) (Gambling Act) based on their voluntary confessions. Considering it was their first offense and they requested leniency, the court sentenced each to a fine of ₹5,000 (total ₹2,000) and 5 days imprisonment in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the three accused (Dhaval @ Buchhiyo Rakeshbhai Parmar, Pravinsinh Ratusinh Parmar, and Jagabhai Chaturbhai Zala) under IPC Section 12(a) (Gambling Act) based on their voluntary confessions. Considering it was their first offense and they requested leniency, the court sentenced each to a fine of ₹5,000 (total ₹2,000) and 5 days imprisonment in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts