GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SANJAY BALDEVBHAI PATEL - GJ01ML5885 — 61329/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 194D. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH220632062026

Filing Number

60581/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

61329/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 194D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY BALDEVBHAI PATEL - GJ01ML5885

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad, upheld the conviction of the accused under Section 188 IPC (disobedience to order by public servant) for violating lockdown/curfew orders. The court rejected the accused's plea that the fine should be reduced, finding sufficient non-compliance with COVID-related restrictions, and directed reinstatement of the original sentence with recovery of the fine amount through appropriate legal proceedings. (Judgment dated 14.03.2026) This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 61329/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad, upheld the conviction of the accused under Section 188 IPC (disobedience to order by public servant) for violating lockdown/curfew orders. The court rejected the accused's plea that the fine should be reduced, finding sufficient non-compliance with COVID-related restrictions, and directed reinstatement of the original sentence with recovery of the fine amount through appropriate legal proceedings. (Judgment dated 14.03.2026) This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case