GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs BHUPENDRASINH GOHIL- GJ01PM2953 — 61162/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 194D. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH220630412026

Filing Number

60418/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

61162/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 194D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHUPENDRASINH GOHIL- GJ01PM2953

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ahmedabad dismissed the accused's plea under the IPC Section 437 (bail application) and rejected the request for bail extension. The court ordered that the accused be reinstated in judicial custody and directed recovery of the fine amount, with the case to be decided in a subsequent special sitting at the magistrate's discretion. The judgment was issued on 14.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 61162/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ahmedabad dismissed the accused's plea under the IPC Section 437 (bail application) and rejected the request for bail extension. The court ordered that the accused be reinstated in judicial custody and directed recovery of the fine amount, with the case to be decided in a subsequent special sitting at the magistrate's discretion. The judgment was issued on 14.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case