GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs RATANLAL SUNNYKUMAR RATANLAL NEMICHANDJI-GJ01UJ9989 — 61019/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 194D. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH220628952026

Filing Number

60278/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

61019/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 194D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RATANLAL SUNNYKUMAR RATANLAL NEMICHANDJI-GJ01UJ9989

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Ahmedabad held that the accused, charged under IPC Section 188 (disobedience of court order), failed to pay the fine despite being given sufficient time, resulting in the fine remaining unpaid and the case pending for an extended period. The court directed that if the accused appears before it in the future, the fine amount should be recovered and the IPC Section 188 proceedings be reinstated, with the judgment to be delivered in open court/special sitting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 61019/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Ahmedabad held that the accused, charged under IPC Section 188 (disobedience of court order), failed to pay the fine despite being given sufficient time, resulting in the fine remaining unpaid and the case pending for an extended period. The court directed that if the accused appears before it in the future, the fine amount should be recovered and the IPC Section 188 proceedings be reinstated, with the judgment to be delivered in open court/special sitting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case