GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs DILIPKUMAR NATHUBHAI PARGHI -GJ01YG5108 — 60858/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 184. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH220627282026

Filing Number

60115/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

60858/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 184

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DILIPKUMAR NATHUBHAI PARGHI -GJ01YG5108

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad, decided an IPC Section 138 (cheque bounce) case by directing the accused to pay the fine amount and reinstating the N.S.P.D. proceedings. The court held that since the accused was convicted under IPC Section 138 but the fine remained unpaid despite sufficient time provided, and the case had been pending for an extended period, the N.S.P.D. petition should be allowed with the option to recover the fine amount through special sitting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 60858/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad, decided an IPC Section 138 (cheque bounce) case by directing the accused to pay the fine amount and reinstating the N.S.P.D. proceedings. The court held that since the accused was convicted under IPC Section 138 but the fine remained unpaid despite sufficient time provided, and the case had been pending for an extended period, the N.S.P.D. petition should be allowed with the option to recover the fine amount through special sitting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case