GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs DILIPKUMAR NATHUBHAI PARGHI -GJ01YG5108 — 60858/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 184. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH220627282026
Filing Number
60115/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
60858/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Court
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
1-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD CITY
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
DILIPKUMAR NATHUBHAI PARGHI -GJ01YG5108
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD CITY
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad, decided an IPC Section 138 (cheque bounce) case by directing the accused to pay the fine amount and reinstating the N.S.P.D. proceedings. The court held that since the accused was convicted under IPC Section 138 but the fine remained unpaid despite sufficient time provided, and the case had been pending for an extended period, the N.S.P.D. petition should be allowed with the option to recover the fine amount through special sitting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad, decided an IPC Section 138 (cheque bounce) case by directing the accused to pay the fine amount and reinstating the N.S.P.D. proceedings. The court held that since the accused was convicted under IPC Section 138 but the fine remained unpaid despite sufficient time provided, and the case had been pending for an extended period, the N.S.P.D. petition should be allowed with the option to recover the fine amount through special sitting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts