AXIS BANK LIMITED vs HARVIRKUMAR BHUPSINGH NAI — 1628/2026

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJAH220626932026

Filing Number

1626/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

1628/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

3-43rd Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AXIS BANK LIMITED

    Adv. C J PRAJAPATI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARVIRKUMAR BHUPSINGH NAI

  2. 2.REKHABEN HARVIR BHAI NAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted Axis Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of a residential property in Ahmedabad owned by the respondents, finding they had failed to repay the loan despite notice. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to execute the order and take possession on the bank's behalf, with directions for police protection and a detailed inventory of movable property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    43rd Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1628/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted Axis Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of a residential property in Ahmedabad owned by the respondents, finding they had failed to repay the loan despite notice. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to execute the order and take possession on the bank's behalf, with directions for police protection and a detailed inventory of movable property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case