GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs PANDYA PURVIBEN-GJ01PR2298 — 60514/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 194D. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH220623612026

Filing Number

59775/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

60514/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 194D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PANDYA PURVIBEN-GJ01PR2298

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad, ruled on an IPC Section 188 (disobedience to court orders) case where the accused failed to pay the fine despite being given adequate time. The court ordered the accused's reinstatement with the fine amount to be recovered, and directed that the case be remanded to the concerned magistrate/special CIT for final adjudication on the default/contempt proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 60514/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad, ruled on an IPC Section 188 (disobedience to court orders) case where the accused failed to pay the fine despite being given adequate time. The court ordered the accused's reinstatement with the fine amount to be recovered, and directed that the case be remanded to the concerned magistrate/special CIT for final adjudication on the default/contempt proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case