GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs MEETABEN SHAH (GJ01FA — 60179/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 194D. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH220620082026

Filing Number

59441/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

60179/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 194D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MEETABEN SHAH (GJ01FA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ahmedabad, decided that the accused under IPC Section 447 (criminal trespass) is acquitted. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the accused was not present during the alleged offense and the evidence was insufficient. The court ordered the reinstatement of the N.S.L. pending case with liberty to the accused to recover the penalty amount, if any, with a direction for appropriate relief in the special sitting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 60179/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ahmedabad, decided that the accused under IPC Section 447 (criminal trespass) is acquitted. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the accused was not present during the alleged offense and the evidence was insufficient. The court ordered the reinstatement of the N.S.L. pending case with liberty to the accused to recover the penalty amount, if any, with a direction for appropriate relief in the special sitting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case