GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs HIREN LAKADIYA -GJ01NY0780 — 60144/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH220619682026

Filing Number

59402/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

60144/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HIREN LAKADIYA -GJ01NY0780

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Ahmedabad ruled that the accused, charged under IPC Section 188 (disobedience to court order), failed to pay the fine despite being given adequate time, resulting in the fine remaining unpaid and the case remaining pending for an extended period. The court directed that the case be reinstated with instructions to recover the fine amount and directed the court to issue appropriate orders in a special sitting to resolve the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 60144/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Ahmedabad ruled that the accused, charged under IPC Section 188 (disobedience to court order), failed to pay the fine despite being given adequate time, resulting in the fine remaining unpaid and the case remaining pending for an extended period. The court directed that the case be reinstated with instructions to recover the fine amount and directed the court to issue appropriate orders in a special sitting to resolve the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case