GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs JIGNESHBHAI RATHOD-GJ03ES1655 — 57888/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 194D. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH220596492026

Filing Number

57159/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

57888/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 194D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JIGNESHBHAI RATHOD-GJ03ES1655

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad, upheld a conviction under IPC Section 294 (obscene act) against the accused, finding that despite being given adequate time to pay the fine, the accused failed to do so and the case remained pending for an extended period. The court ordered the reinstatement of the N.S.L. proceedings along with recovery of the fine amount, with the case to be decided in a special/additional sitting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 57888/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad, upheld a conviction under IPC Section 294 (obscene act) against the accused, finding that despite being given adequate time to pay the fine, the accused failed to do so and the case remained pending for an extended period. The court ordered the reinstatement of the N.S.L. proceedings along with recovery of the fine amount, with the case to be decided in a special/additional sitting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case