GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs LOVE MODI - GJ27CN5802 — 57875/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 194D. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH220596342026

Filing Number

57144/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

57875/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 194D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LOVE MODI - GJ27CN5802

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad, upheld the conviction of an accused under IPC Section 188 (disobedience to order by public servant) for violating a lockdown/curfew order during COVID-19. The court rejected the accused's plea that insufficient time was given to pay the fine, and directed recovery of the unpaid fine amount along with release of the accused from custody, reserving the option for a special sitting to pass further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 57875/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad, upheld the conviction of an accused under IPC Section 188 (disobedience to order by public servant) for violating a lockdown/curfew order during COVID-19. The court rejected the accused's plea that insufficient time was given to pay the fine, and directed recovery of the unpaid fine amount along with release of the accused from custody, reserving the option for a special sitting to pass further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case