GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs RAMILABEN PARMAR-GJ01MZ30 — 57718/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH220594652026

Filing Number

56979/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

57718/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMILABEN PARMAR-GJ01MZ30

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad, ordered that the accused, who was convicted under IPC Section 294 (obscene conduct) and sentenced to imprisonment, be reinstated with benefits of the Probation of Offenders Act. The court directed the suspension of the sentence and granted probation with appropriate conditions, allowing the accused to be released on probation instead of serving the imprisonment term. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 57718/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad, ordered that the accused, who was convicted under IPC Section 294 (obscene conduct) and sentenced to imprisonment, be reinstated with benefits of the Probation of Offenders Act. The court directed the suspension of the sentence and granted probation with appropriate conditions, allowing the accused to be released on probation instead of serving the imprisonment term. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case