GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs KIRIT S PATEL -GJ27CL9238 — 57654/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 194D. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH220594032026

Filing Number

56917/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

57654/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 194D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KIRIT S PATEL -GJ27CL9238

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Ahmedabad convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque without sufficient funds. Although time was given to pay the penalty, it remained unpaid, and the case was pending for an extended period. The court ordered the reinstatement of the N.I. Act proceedings and directed that the penalty amount be recovered, with the case to be decided in a special sitting by the N.I. Act Magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 57654/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Ahmedabad convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque without sufficient funds. Although time was given to pay the penalty, it remained unpaid, and the case was pending for an extended period. The court ordered the reinstatement of the N.I. Act proceedings and directed that the penalty amount be recovered, with the case to be decided in a special sitting by the N.I. Act Magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case