GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs DHARMENDRA RATANSINGH YADAV-GJ03ER9437 — 57201/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH220589492026

Filing Number

56471/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

57201/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DHARMENDRA RATANSINGH YADAV-GJ03ER9437

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad, ordered that the accused be given adequate time to pay the fine imposed under IPC Section 307. Since the fine remained unpaid and the case was pending for an extended period, the court directed that the case be reinstated with the fine amount to be recovered, and the IPC be restored in the court record with a direction for the Lokayukta/Special CBI to proceed further if necessary. The judgment is dated 14.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 57201/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad, ordered that the accused be given adequate time to pay the fine imposed under IPC Section 307. Since the fine remained unpaid and the case was pending for an extended period, the court directed that the case be reinstated with the fine amount to be recovered, and the IPC be restored in the court record with a direction for the Lokayukta/Special CBI to proceed further if necessary. The judgment is dated 14.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case