GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs BHARAT BHAI B PARMAR-GJ01PM7836 — 56665/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 194D. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH220583992026

Filing Number

55932/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

56665/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 194D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHARAT BHAI B PARMAR-GJ01PM7836

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad, upheld a conviction under IPC Section 294 (obscene act in public) against the accused, finding him guilty of committing an obscene act in a public place. The court confirmed the sentence and imposed a fine, directing that if the fine remains unpaid, the case be remitted to a special/lok adalat for recovery, while also reinstating the original IPC Section 294 penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 56665/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad, upheld a conviction under IPC Section 294 (obscene act in public) against the accused, finding him guilty of committing an obscene act in a public place. The court confirmed the sentence and imposed a fine, directing that if the fine remains unpaid, the case be remitted to a special/lok adalat for recovery, while also reinstating the original IPC Section 294 penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case