GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs GIRIVER R PUROHIT-GJ27CP7907 — 56456/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 194D. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH220581892026

Filing Number

55725/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

56456/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 194D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GIRIVER R PUROHIT-GJ27CP7907

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ahmedabad, ruled in an IPC Section 138 (dishonored cheque) case that the accused failed to pay the fine amount despite being given sufficient time. The court directed the accused to either pay the fine amount or face imprisonment, and ordered the case to be reinstated in a special sitting to execute the sentence. The judgment was delivered on 14/03/2026 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 56456/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ahmedabad, ruled in an IPC Section 138 (dishonored cheque) case that the accused failed to pay the fine amount despite being given sufficient time. The court directed the accused to either pay the fine amount or face imprisonment, and ordered the case to be reinstated in a special sitting to execute the sentence. The judgment was delivered on 14/03/2026 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case