GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SANTOSH VIJAYBHAI SAROJ Advocate - R.G.BHARVAD — 46017/2024
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 17th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH220555242024
Filing Number
46022/2024
Filing Date
16-04-2024
Registration No
46017/2024
Registration Date
16-04-2024
Court
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
2-ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD CITY
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
FIR Details
FIR Number
11191035231739
Police Station
NARODA POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD CITY
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SANTOSH VIJAYBHAI SAROJ Advocate - R.G.BHARVAD
RAKESH KHUBLAL PATEL
ANAND SURATDIN SAROJ
VINODKUMAR NATHURAM SAROJ
NIRAJ MAHESHBHAI MORYA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD CITY
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 29-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 18-11-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 23-09-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The High Court of Gujarat granted bail to accused persons #3 and #5 by stopping proceedings under CrPC Section 258, while accused #1, #2, and #4 were found guilty and sentenced accordingly with case fees imposed. The court ordered forfeiture of seized property to the government, directed inquiry into rightful ownership of movable assets, and set procedures for handling valuables and non-valuable items, emphasizing that proceedings could not continue indefinitely against the bailed accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Gujarat granted bail to accused persons #3 and #5 by stopping proceedings under CrPC Section 258, while accused #1, #2, and #4 were found guilty and sentenced accordingly with case fees imposed. The court ordered forfeiture of seized property to the government, directed inquiry into rightful ownership of movable assets, and set procedures for handling valuables and non-valuable items, emphasizing that proceedings could not continue indefinitely against the bailed accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts