GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SANJAYBHAI URFE SANJU JAGDISHBHAI FULCHANDBHAI YADAV — 51403/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2),54. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH220528642026

Filing Number

50680/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

51403/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 15-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11191015240592

Police Station

Nikol Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2),54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANJAYBHAI URFE SANJU JAGDISHBHAI FULCHANDBHAI YADAV

  2. 2.RANJEET HANUMANJI BHAGVANJI RAJPUT (SISODIYA)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad acquitted the accused under BNS Section 359(1)(8) and discharged them from the charges under BNS Section 303(2), Paragraph 4 based on the complainant's settlement petition. The court accepted the compromise and ordered the police to dispose of seized materials according to law, returning them to their rightful owner if applicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 51403/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad acquitted the accused under BNS Section 359(1)(8) and discharged them from the charges under BNS Section 303(2), Paragraph 4 based on the complainant's settlement petition. The court accepted the compromise and ordered the police to dispose of seized materials according to law, returning them to their rightful owner if applicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case