GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs DEVA OJILAL RAM KARAN PAL Advocate - A H SHAH — 51273/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH220527352026

Filing Number

50554/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

51273/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 15-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11191015250425

Police Station

Nikol Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEVA OJILAL RAM KARAN PAL Advocate - A H SHAH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Ahmedabad Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused under BNS Section 359(1)(8) by accepting the complainant's satisfaction petition, thereby discharging him from the offense under BNS Section 303(2). The court found that since the complainant did not wish to proceed further, the prosecution lacked merit and grounds for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 51273/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Ahmedabad Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused under BNS Section 359(1)(8) by accepting the complainant's satisfaction petition, thereby discharging him from the offense under BNS Section 303(2). The court found that since the complainant did not wish to proceed further, the prosecution lacked merit and grounds for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case