THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs jignaben daksheshbhia bhailal patel Advocate - C B PATEL — 1701327/2010

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 120A,419,420. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH220104542010

Filing Number

1701327/2010

Filing Date

25-Aug-2010

Registration No

1701327/2010

Registration Date

25-Aug-2010

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

5-4th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

210

Police Station

SARDARNAGAR POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD CITY

Year

2010

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 120A,419,420
Passports Act, 1967 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.jignaben daksheshbhia bhailal patel Advocate - C B PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: STATE OF GUJARAT v. JIGNABEN DAKSHESHBHAI BHAILAL PATEL Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused, Jignaben Daksheshbhai Bhailal Patel, of charges under IPC sections 419, 420, 120(B) and the Passport Act, section 12. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused used a forged passport to travel abroad illegally, as no concrete documentary evidence or independent corroboration supported the charge. Key Reasoning: The court found significant gaps in the investigation—the alleged accomplices were not located, no forensic examination of documents was conducted, proper authorization for the chargesheet was not obtained, and crucial evidence regarding the passport's authenticity was lacking. While the complainant (a police officer) provided testimony, independent witnesses could not substantiate the core allegations of illegal international travel using a fake identity document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  7. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  8. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  9. 01-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  10. 27-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    30th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  11. 10-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    12th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  12. 03-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    12th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  13. 28-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    12th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  14. 29-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    12th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  15. 26-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    12th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  16. 11-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    12th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  17. 18-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate

  18. 18-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate

  19. 23-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate

  20. 13-Dec-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate

  21. 23-Oct-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate

  22. 23-Aug-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate

  23. 12-Jul-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate

  24. 16-May-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate

  25. 27-Feb-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate

  26. 21-Oct-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  27. 30-Aug-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  28. 29-Jun-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  29. 06-May-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  30. 15-Apr-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  31. 15-Mar-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  32. 13-Jan-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  33. 16-Dec-2021

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  34. 27-Oct-2021

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  35. 18-Oct-2021

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  36. 08-Sep-2021

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  37. 14-Jun-2021

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  38. 23-Mar-2021

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  39. 05-Jan-2021

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  40. 19-Oct-2020

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  41. 11-Aug-2020

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  42. 20-May-2020

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  43. 18-Mar-2020

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  44. 21-Jan-2020

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  45. 25-Nov-2019

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  46. 18-Oct-2019

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  47. 16-Aug-2019

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  48. 24-Jun-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  49. 25-Apr-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  50. 25-Feb-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  51. 28-Dec-2018

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  52. 17-Nov-2018

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  53. 24-Sep-2018

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  54. 08-Aug-2018

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  55. 28-Jun-2018

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  56. 17-May-2018

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  57. 10-Apr-2018

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  58. 27-Nov-2017

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  59. 28-Aug-2017

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  60. 27-May-2017

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  61. 24-Apr-2017

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  62. 21-Jan-2017

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  63. 22-Aug-2016

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  64. 08-Jun-2016

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  65. 19-Jan-2016

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  66. 19-Nov-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  67. 25-Aug-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1701327/2010

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: STATE OF GUJARAT v. JIGNABEN DAKSHESHBHAI BHAILAL PATEL Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused, Jignaben Daksheshbhai Bhailal Patel, of charges under IPC sections 419, 420, 120(B) and the Passport Act, section 12. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused used a forged passport to travel abroad illegally, as no concrete documentary evidence or independent corroboration supported the charge. Key Reasoning: The court found significant gaps in the investigation—the alleged accomplices were not located, no forensic examination of documents was conducted, proper authorization for the chargesheet was not obtained, and crucial evidence regarding the passport's authenticity was lacking. While the complainant (a police officer) provided testimony, independent witnesses could not substantiate the core allegations of illegal international travel using a fake identity document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case