MUKESH R PATEL vs PARASH MADICAL PROVIZAN STOR(Permanently exempted) Advocate - D B SHAH — 100382/2009

Case under Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Section 018,027. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH220002692009

Filing Number

100382/2009

Filing Date

02-Jun-2009

Registration No

100382/2009

Registration Date

02-Jun-2009

Court

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Section 018,027

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUKESH R PATEL

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARASH MADICAL PROVIZAN STOR(Permanently exempted) Advocate - D B SHAH

  2. 2.MANIBEN N PATEL(Permanently exempted)

    Adv. D B SHAH,D B SHAH

  3. 3.BIPINCHENDRA M PATEL(Permanently exempted)

    Adv. D B SHAH,D B SHAH

  4. 4.JIGNESH M PATEL(Permanently exempted)

    Adv. D B SHAH,D B SHAH

  5. 5.PANKAJ M PATEL

    Adv. D B SHAH,D B SHAH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Ahmedabad Chief Judicial Magistrate Court convicted five accused persons under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (formerly IPC sections 18(i), 18(e)(4), and 27(d)), sentencing each to a fine of Rs. 3,000 and collectively imposing Rs. 15,000 in fines, with a reduced quantum considering their first-time offenses, weak financial conditions, and lack of prior criminal history. The court applied the principles of judicial discretion for lenient sentencing established in prior Gujarat High Court precedents, finding the accused guilty but ordering minimal punishment rather than rigorous imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  6. 23-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  7. 10-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  8. 25-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  9. 19-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  10. 11-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  11. 05-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  12. 27-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  13. 08-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  14. 16-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City

  15. 13-May-2024

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  16. 18-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  17. 17-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  18. 30-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  19. 21-Oct-2023

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  20. 14-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  21. 03-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  22. 19-May-2023

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  23. 18-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  24. 04-Feb-2023

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  25. 03-Jan-2023

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  26. 05-Nov-2022

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  27. 04-Oct-2022

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  28. 19-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  29. 01-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  30. 28-Jun-2022

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  31. 16-Apr-2022

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  32. 19-Jan-2022

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  33. 27-Dec-2021

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  34. 27-Sep-2021

    Hearing

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  35. 23-Jun-2021

    Hearing

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  36. 22-Mar-2021

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  37. 23-Dec-2020

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  38. 21-Sep-2020

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  39. 02-Jul-2020

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  40. 22-Apr-2020

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  41. 24-Feb-2020

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  42. 16-Jan-2020

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  43. 26-Nov-2019

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  44. 01-Oct-2019

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  45. 20-Aug-2019

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  46. 09-Jul-2019

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  47. 03-Jun-2019

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  48. 06-May-2019

    Hearing

  49. 25-Feb-2019

    Hearing

    Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  50. 07-Jan-2019

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  51. 19-Nov-2018

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  52. 01-Oct-2018

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  53. 27-Aug-2018

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  54. 09-Jul-2018

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  55. 14-May-2018

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  56. 17-Apr-2018

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  57. 26-Mar-2018

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  58. 12-Feb-2018

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  59. 08-Jan-2018

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  60. 18-Dec-2017

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  61. 16-Oct-2017

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  62. 14-Aug-2017

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  63. 17-Jul-2017

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  64. 12-Jun-2017

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  65. 23-Jan-2017

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  66. 19-Sep-2016

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  67. 05-Aug-2016

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  68. 20-Jun-2016

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  69. 02-May-2016

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  70. 22-Mar-2016

    Hearing

  71. 16-Feb-2016

    Hearing

  72. 19-Jan-2016

    Hearing

  73. 07-Dec-2015

    Hearing

  74. 02-Nov-2015

    Hearing

  75. 06-Oct-2015

    Hearing

  76. 07-Sep-2015

    Hearing

  77. 17-Aug-2015

    Hearing

  78. 27-Jul-2015

    Hearing

  79. 02-Jul-2015

    Hearing

  80. 24-Jun-2015

    Hearing

  81. 15-Jun-2015

    Hearing

  82. 08-May-2015

    Hearing

  83. 04-May-2015

    Hearing

  84. 13-Apr-2015

    Hearing

  85. 04-Mar-2015

    Hearing

  86. 27-Jan-2015

    Hearing

  87. 29-Dec-2014

    Hearing

  88. 04-Dec-2014

    Hearing

  89. 19-Nov-2014

    Hearing

  90. 14-Oct-2014

    Hearing

  91. 26-Sep-2014

    Hearing

  92. 20-Aug-2014

    Hearing

  93. 09-Jul-2014

    Hearing

  94. 07-May-2014

    Hearing

  95. 08-Jan-2014

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  96. 30-Oct-2013

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  97. 04-Sep-2013

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  98. 24-Jul-2013

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  99. 13-Jun-2013

    Hearing

    Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

  100. 01-May-2013

    Hearing

  101. 14-Jun-2012

    Hearing

  102. 11-Apr-2012

    Hearing

  103. 23-Feb-2012

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  104. 02-Jun-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100382/2009

casestatus.in Summary

The Ahmedabad Chief Judicial Magistrate Court convicted five accused persons under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (formerly IPC sections 18(i), 18(e)(4), and 27(d)), sentencing each to a fine of Rs. 3,000 and collectively imposing Rs. 15,000 in fines, with a reduced quantum considering their first-time offenses, weak financial conditions, and lack of prior criminal history. The court applied the principles of judicial discretion for lenient sentencing established in prior Gujarat High Court precedents, finding the accused guilty but ordering minimal punishment rather than rigorous imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case