MUKESH R PATEL vs PARASH MADICAL PROVIZAN STOR(Permanently exempted) Advocate - D B SHAH — 100382/2009
Case under Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Section 018,027. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH220002692009
Filing Number
100382/2009
Filing Date
02-06-2009
Registration No
100382/2009
Registration Date
02-06-2009
Court
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
1-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD CITY
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MUKESH R PATEL
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PARASH MADICAL PROVIZAN STOR(Permanently exempted) Advocate - D B SHAH
MANIBEN N PATEL(Permanently exempted)
Adv. D B SHAH,D B SHAH
BIPINCHENDRA M PATEL(Permanently exempted)
Adv. D B SHAH,D B SHAH
JIGNESH M PATEL(Permanently exempted)
Adv. D B SHAH,D B SHAH
PANKAJ M PATEL
Adv. D B SHAH,D B SHAH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD CITY
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 23-01-2026 | HEARING |
| 10-10-2025 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Ahmedabad Chief Judicial Magistrate Court convicted five accused persons under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (formerly IPC sections 18(i), 18(e)(4), and 27(d)), sentencing each to a fine of Rs. 3,000 and collectively imposing Rs. 15,000 in fines, with a reduced quantum considering their first-time offenses, weak financial conditions, and lack of prior criminal history. The court applied the principles of judicial discretion for lenient sentencing established in prior Gujarat High Court precedents, finding the accused guilty but ordering minimal punishment rather than rigorous imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Ahmedabad Chief Judicial Magistrate Court convicted five accused persons under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (formerly IPC sections 18(i), 18(e)(4), and 27(d)), sentencing each to a fine of Rs. 3,000 and collectively imposing Rs. 15,000 in fines, with a reduced quantum considering their first-time offenses, weak financial conditions, and lack of prior criminal history. The court applied the principles of judicial discretion for lenient sentencing established in prior Gujarat High Court precedents, finding the accused guilty but ordering minimal punishment rather than rigorous imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts