THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES vs HITESH M. PATEL — 200497/2003
Case under Companies Act, 1956 Section 209,211. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH220002062003
Filing Number
200497/2003
Filing Date
29-11-2003
Registration No
200497/2003
Registration Date
29-11-2003
Court
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
2-ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD CITY
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
HITESH M. PATEL
MOHANBHAI P. PATEL
JIGNESH A. RAVAL
KALPESH A. RAVAL
MAHENDRABHAI P. SHAH
KILLOI V. SHELAT
LALITKUMAR JOSHI
RAKESH PATEL
CHANDRAKANT B. MEHTA
Adv. R R SHARMA
VARSHABEN J. SHAH
Adv. R R SHARMA
KAMLESH H. SHAH
Adv. R R SHARMA
PRAKASH V. SHAH
Adv. R R SHARMA
PANKAJ J. SHAH
Adv. R R SHARMA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD CITY
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 10-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 31-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 30-09-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused under the Companies Act, 1956 (Sections 211, 211(7), and 209(5)(6)) for offenses related to company records and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000 (with 10 days simple imprisonment as alternate punishment). The court considered this the accused's first offense, granted leniency, and advised against repetition of such crimes in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the accused under the Companies Act, 1956 (Sections 211, 211(7), and 209(5)(6)) for offenses related to company records and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000 (with 10 days simple imprisonment as alternate punishment). The court considered this the accused's first offense, granted leniency, and advised against repetition of such crimes in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts