THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES vs HITESH M. PATEL Advocate - S P TRIVEDI — 200495/2003
Case under Companies Act, 1956 Section 217. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH220002042003
Filing Number
200495/2003
Filing Date
25-11-2003
Registration No
200495/2003
Registration Date
25-11-2003
Court
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
2-ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD CITY
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
HITESH M. PATEL Advocate - S P TRIVEDI
MOHANBHAI P. PATEL
JIGNESH A. RAVAL
Adv. S P TRIVEDI
KALPESH A. RAVAL
Adv. S P TRIVEDI
MAHENDRABHAI P. SHAH
Adv. S P TRIVEDI
KILLOI V. SHELAT
LALITKUMAR JOSHI
Adv. S P TRIVEDI
RAKESH PATEL
Adv. S P TRIVEDI
CHANDRAKANT B. MEHTA
Adv. R R SHARMA
VARSHABEN J. SHAH
Adv. R R SHARMA
KAMLESH H. SHAH
Adv. R R SHARMA
PRAKASH V. SHAH
Adv. R R SHARMA
PANKAJ J. SHAH
Adv. R R SHARMA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD CITY
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 10-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 31-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 30-09-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused under Section 217(5) of the Companies Act, 1956, for violating provisions related to company regulations. The accused was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 1,000 (or one thousand rupees) and, in default of payment, to simple imprisonment for 10 days. The court considered this the accused's first offense and imposed the sentence with a view toward reformation and deterrence against future violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court convicted the accused under Section 217(5) of the Companies Act, 1956, for violating provisions related to company regulations. The accused was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 1,000 (or one thousand rupees) and, in default of payment, to simple imprisonment for 10 days. The court considered this the accused's first offense and imposed the sentence with a view toward reformation and deterrence against future violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts