THE REGISTRAR COMPANIES vs MR. HITESH M. PATEL — 200494/2003
Case under Companies Act, 1956 Section 209. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH220002032003
Filing Number
200494/2003
Filing Date
25-11-2003
Registration No
200494/2003
Registration Date
25-11-2003
Court
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
2-ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD CITY
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE REGISTRAR COMPANIES
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MR. HITESH M. PATEL
MOHANBHAI F PATEL
MR JIGNESH A RAVEL
MR KALPESH A RAVEL
MR MAHENDRABHAI P SHAH
MR KILLOI V SHELAT
MR LALIT KUMAR JOSHI
MR RAKESH PATEL
MR CHANDRAKANT V MEHTA
Adv. R R SHARMA
MIS VARSABEN J SHAH
Adv. R R SHARMA
MR KAMLES H SHAH
Adv. R R SHARMA
PANKAJ J SHAH
Adv. R R SHARMA
PRAKAS V SHAH
Adv. R R SHARMA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD CITY
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 10-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 31-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 30-09-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused under Section 208 read with Section 208(5)(6) of the Companies Act, 1956, for falsifying records and making fraudulent statements. The accused was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 1,500 (or 10 days simple imprisonment in default), taking into account that this was his first offense and considering mitigating circumstances in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court convicted the accused under Section 208 read with Section 208(5)(6) of the Companies Act, 1956, for falsifying records and making fraudulent statements. The accused was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 1,500 (or 10 days simple imprisonment in default), taking into account that this was his first offense and considering mitigating circumstances in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts