REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES vs MS.OASIS MEDIA METRIX LTD., Advocate - R R SHARMA — 200493/2003
Case under Companies Act, 1956 Section 151. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH220002022003
Filing Number
200493/2003
Filing Date
25-11-2003
Registration No
200493/2003
Registration Date
25-11-2003
Court
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
2-ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD CITY
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MS.OASIS MEDIA METRIX LTD., Advocate - R R SHARMA
HITESH M. PATEL
MOHANBHAI P PATEL
JIGNESH A RAWAL
KALPESH A RAVAL
MAHENRBHAI P SHAH
KILLOI V SHELAT
LALITKUMAR JOSHI
RAKESH PATEL
CHANDRKANT B MAHETA
Adv. R R SHARMA
VARSHABEN J SHAH
Adv. R R SHARMA
LAMLESH H SHAH
Adv. R R SHARMA
PRAKASH V SHAH
Adv. R R SHARMA
PANKAJ J SHAH
Adv. R R SHARMA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD CITY
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 10-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 31-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 30-09-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused under Section 151(4) of the Companies Act, 1956, finding that the accused made false claims about company assets. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹200 (or five days simple imprisonment in default), considering it as a first offense with remorse shown and recognizing the accused's clean record and cooperation with authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court convicted the accused under Section 151(4) of the Companies Act, 1956, finding that the accused made false claims about company assets. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹200 (or five days simple imprisonment in default), considering it as a first offense with remorse shown and recognizing the accused's clean record and cooperation with authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts