THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, GUJARAT, DADRA NAGAR HAVELE vs MS.OASIS MEDIA METRIX LTD., — 200074/2004
Case under Companies Act, 1956 Section 58, 13R/W17, R/W 629A. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH220001102004
Filing Number
200074/2004
Filing Date
02-06-2004
Registration No
200074/2004
Registration Date
02-06-2004
Court
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
2-ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD CITY
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, GUJARAT, DADRA NAGAR HAVELE
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MS.OASIS MEDIA METRIX LTD.,
MR.HITESH M,PATEL
MR.MOHAN F.PATEL
MR.JIGNESH A.RAWAL
MR,KALPESH A.RAWAL
MR.MAHENDRABHAI P.SHAH
MR.KILLOI V.SHELAT
Adv. K V SHELAT
MR.LALIT JOSHI LALITKUMAR JOSHI
MR.CHANDRAKANT B.MEHTA
Adv. R R SHARMA
SM,T.VERSHABEN J.SHAH
Adv. R R SHARMA
MR,RAKESH PATEL
MR.KAMLESH H.SHAH
Adv. R R SHARMA
SHRI PRAKASH V.SHAH
Adv. R R SHARMA
MR.PANKAJ J.SHAH
Adv. R R SHARMA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD CITY
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 10-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 31-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 30-09-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused under Sections 13 and 17 of the Companies Act, 1956, accepting his voluntary plea of guilty. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 833 for 119 days of violation (Rs. 7 per day) and, in default of payment, 10 days simple imprisonment, considering it as his first offense and noting his commitment to reform. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court convicted the accused under Sections 13 and 17 of the Companies Act, 1956, accepting his voluntary plea of guilty. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 833 for 119 days of violation (Rs. 7 per day) and, in default of payment, 10 days simple imprisonment, considering it as his first offense and noting his commitment to reform. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts