GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs MAFATBHAI PASABHAI SOLANKI Advocate - A S PARKAR, D G CHAVDA — 100032/2010
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 114,380. Status: Evidence Of Prosecution. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH220000272010
Filing Number
100032/2010
Filing Date
22-Jan-2010
Registration No
100032/2010
Registration Date
22-Jan-2010
Court
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
328
Police Station
SHAHIBAUG POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD CITY
Year
2009
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAFATBHAI PASABHAI SOLANKI Advocate - A S PARKAR, D G CHAVDA
-
2.CHETANKUMAR GIRISHBHAI PARMAR (CRPC - 317(
-
3.)
Adv. B H RAVAL,A D CHAVDA
-
4.ANILKUMAR SOMABHAI VANKAR
Adv. J K CHAUHAN
-
5.BHARATBHAI MULAJIBHAI VAGHELA
Adv. R O NAVLAKHA
Case History
-
08-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
05-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
20-May-2025
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
25-Apr-2025
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
10-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
07-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
21-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
30-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
06-Sep-2024
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
19-Jul-2024
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
15-May-2024
Process To Accused
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2024
Process To Accused
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
12-Jan-2024
Process To Accused
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
01-Nov-2023
Process To Accused
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
22-Sep-2023
Process To Accused
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
21-Aug-2023
Process To Accused
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
26-Jun-2023
Process To Accused
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
18-Apr-2023
Process To Accused
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2023
Process To Accused
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
02-Feb-2023
Process To Accused
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
16-Nov-2022
Process To Accused
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
01-Sep-2022
Process To Accused
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
28-Jun-2022
Process To Accused
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
16-Apr-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
19-Jan-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
27-Dec-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
27-Sep-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
23-Jun-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
22-Mar-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
23-Dec-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
21-Sep-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
02-Jul-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
22-Apr-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
10-Feb-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
24-Dec-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
19-Nov-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
03-Oct-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
26-Aug-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
17-Jul-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
11-Jun-2019
Process To Accused
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
27-Mar-2019
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
05-Feb-2019
Process To Accused
Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
19-Dec-2018
Process To Accused
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
14-Nov-2018
Process To Accused
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
06-Oct-2018
Process To Accused
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
15-Sep-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
03-Jul-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
20-Mar-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
08-Feb-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
28-Dec-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
22-Nov-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
18-Sep-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
18-Jul-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
07-Jun-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
17-Apr-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
06-Mar-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
21-Jan-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
23-Nov-2016
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
05-Oct-2016
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
06-Sep-2016
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
23-Jul-2016
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
20-Jun-2016
Process To Accused
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
15-Sep-2014
Order Number 1View PDF
Summary In this criminal case (C.C. No. 32-10), the court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Section 380 (theft of syringe and pump from a civil hospital). The court found insufficient evidence from prosecution witnesses to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The accused are released and any bail bonds furnished are to be cancelled, with the seized syringe pump returned to the hospital authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Sep-2014
Process To Accused
-
02-Sep-2014
Further Statement
-
07-Aug-2014
Evidence Of Prosecution
-
10-Jul-2014
Evidence Of Prosecution
-
10-Jun-2014
Evidence Of Prosecution
-
02-May-2014
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2014
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
17-Oct-2013
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
21-Aug-2013
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
24-May-2013
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
-
08-Aug-2012
Evidence Of Prosecution
-
11-Jun-2012
Evidence Of Prosecution
-
02-May-2012
Evidence Of Prosecution
-
31-Mar-2012
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jan-2010
Case filed
Registration No. 100032/2010
Summary In this criminal case (C.C. No. 32-10), the court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Section 380 (theft of syringe and pump from a civil hospital). The court found insufficient evidence from prosecution witnesses to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The accused are released and any bail bonds furnished are to be cancelled, with the seized syringe pump returned to the hospital authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts