Government of Gujarat vs KETANBHAI JAYANTIBHAI DHARAJIYA — 88/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 95. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJAH180003402026

Case disposed

Filing Number

88/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

88/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Court

FTC COURT, VIRAMGAM

Judge

1-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

1

Police Station

ACB AhmedabadRural

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 95
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988 Section 7(a),12

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

KETANBHAI JAYANTIBHAI DHARAJIYA

JAYANTIBHAI DHUDAJI THAKOR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

13-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
ORDER

The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) granted the State of Gujarat's application to collect telecommunications data (CDR, SDR, CAF records and certificates under Section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam) for multiple mobile numbers belonging to the accused and a third party. The court found that although a chargesheet had been filed in CR No.01/2026, the investigating officer's request for further investigation under Section 193(9) of BNSS was justified as the requested information was necessary to investigate the offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) granted the State of Gujarat's application to collect telecommunications data (CDR, SDR, CAF records and certificates under Section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam) for multiple mobile numbers belonging to the accused and a third party. The court found that although a chargesheet had been filed in CR No.01/2026, the investigating officer's request for further investigation under Section 193(9) of BNSS was justified as the requested information was necessary to investigate the offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

FTC COURT, VIRAMGAM All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case