MUKESHBHAI GOVAJI THAKOR vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 85/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH180003342026
Filing Number
85/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
85/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
FTC COURT, VIRAMGAM
Judge
1-6th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11192060260040
Police Station
VIRAMGAM- RURAL POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUKESHBHAI GOVAJI THAKOR
Adv. G M DAMOR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) granted regular bail to Mukeshbhai Govaji Thakor under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for alleged offences under Section 65(F) of the Prohibition Act. The court found that investigation was practically complete with no pending recovery/discovery and that continued detention would constitute pretrial conviction. Bail was granted on Rs. 40,000 bond with one surety of equal amount, subject to stringent conditions including monthly reporting to the investigating officer, non-interference with witnesses, passport deposit, and restriction from leaving Gujarat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
6th Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 85/2026
Court Decision Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) granted regular bail to Mukeshbhai Govaji Thakor under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for alleged offences under Section 65(F) of the Prohibition Act. The court found that investigation was practically complete with no pending recovery/discovery and that continued detention would constitute pretrial conviction. Bail was granted on Rs. 40,000 bond with one surety of equal amount, subject to stringent conditions including monthly reporting to the investigating officer, non-interference with witnesses, passport deposit, and restriction from leaving Gujarat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts